首页> 外文OA文献 >Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP™) uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living
【2h】

Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP™) uniquely measures spatial neglect during activities of daily living

机译:凯斯勒基金会忽视评估程序(KF-Nap™)独特地衡量日常生活活动中的空间忽视

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To explore the factor structure of the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP), and evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of spatial neglect among stroke survivors. DESIGN: Inception cohort. SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=121) with unilateral brain damage from their first stroke were assessed within 72 hours of admission to an IRF, and 108 were assessed again within 72 hours before IRF discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Usual and standard IRF care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: During each assessment session, occupational therapists measured patients\u27 functions with the KF-NAP, FIM, and Barthel Index (BI). RESULTS: The KF-NAP showed excellent internal consistency with a single-factor structure. The exploratory factor analysis revealed the KF-NAP to be unique from both the FIM and BI even though all 3 scales were correlated. Symptoms of spatial neglect (KF-NAP\u3e0) were present in 67.8% of the participants at admission and 47.2% at discharge. Participants showing the disorder at IRF admission were hospitalized longer than those showing no symptoms. Among those presenting with symptoms, the regression analysis showed that the KF-NAP scores at admission negatively predicted FIM scores at discharge, after controlling for age, FIM at admission, and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The KF-NAP uniquely quantifies symptoms of spatial neglect by measuring functional difficulties that are not captured by the FIM or BI. Using the KF-NAP to measure spatial neglect, we found the disorder persistent after inpatient rehabilitation, and replicated previous findings showing that spatial neglect adversely affects rehabilitation outcome even after prolonged IRF care.
机译:目的:探讨凯斯勒基金会忽视评估过程(KF-NAP)的因素结构,并评估中风幸存者中空间忽视的发生率和临床意义。设计:初始队列。地点:住院康复设施(IRF)。参与者:首次入院时具有单侧脑损伤的参与者(N = 121)在接受IRF的72小时内进行了评估,在IRF出院前的72小时内再次进行了108人的评估。干预措施:常规和标准的IRF护理。主要观察指标:在每次评估期间,职业治疗师均使用KF-NAP,FIM和Barthel指数(BI)测量患者的功能。结果:KF-NAP具有出色的内部一致性和单因素结构。探索性因素分析表明,即使所有三个量表都相关,KF-NAP在FIM和BI方面也是独特的。入院时有67.8%的参与者出现空间疏忽的症状(KF-NAP \ u3e0),出院时有47.2%的参与者出现空间忽视的症状。在IRF入院时表现出疾病的参与者住院的时间比没有症状的参与者住院的时间更长。在那些有症状的患者中,回归分析表明,入院时的KF-NAP评分对年龄,入院时的FIM和住院时间进行了控制后,对出院时的FIM评分具有负面预测。结论:KF-NAP通过测量FIM或BI未捕获的功能困难来唯一地量化空间忽视的症状。使用KF-NAP来测量空间疏忽,我们发现该疾病在住院康复后仍持续存在,并且重复了先前的发现,表明即使在长时间的IRF护理下,空间疏忽也会对康复结果产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号